-
Recent Posts
Archives
Meta
- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic life academic writing argument authority in writing blogging books conclusion conference papers crafting writing discourse dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers epistemology Europe introduction journal knowledge production literature review mess methods chapter note-taking ontology peer review PhD PhD by publication powerpoint publication plan public engagement publishing readership reading refereeing reflection rejection research education research methods research plan research project scholarly identity signposts theory thesis time voice writing
Twitter Updates
- RT @jembloomfield: Medieval Crimes: Detective Fiction and History | quiteirregular quiteirregular.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/med… 1 hour ago
- RT @mark_carrigan: Convention for #HigherEd, 24th May 2013 - 25th May 2013 arts.brighton.ac.uk/research/cappe… 2 hours ago
- Why journal articles get rejected? seven common reasons. ow.ly/1WrH5k #acwri #ecrchat #phdchat #gradchat 4 hours ago
Top Posts & Pages
- seven reasons why journals reject papers
- early onset satisfaction – a bad thing for writing and writers
- writing the thesis
- oh no, someone did the research before me...
- a Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis
- about me
- academic writing
- methodology isn't methods.. or... what goes in a methods chapter
- this academic life
- writing for journals
Monthly Archives: March 2012
finding the right writing time/place
I write this sitting in the kitchen sink. That is, my feet are in it, the rest of me is on the draining board. This is how Dodie Smith began I capture the castle, a journal-style novel about a teenager … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, office, place, time
Tagged academic writing, Nippert-Eng, Pat Thomson, place, routine, time
18 Comments
early career researchers and the high impact journal
I was recently on a shortlisting panel for the three year postdoctoral fellowships offered by my university. Each of the five faculties had produced their own priority list from which the panel was to choose a subset to be interviewed. … Continue reading
what’s at stake for an early career researcher in going for publication in a top ranked journal ?
I often get asked in workshops whether early career researchers should aim to get into a top journal. I want to give the first two parts of my answer in this post. My first response – WHO IS SAYING THIS … Continue reading
beginning the literature review – taking notes
The purpose of the literature review shapes the way that noting is done. And the purpose is to situate your study in the field – that is, to establish a space for the work you are going to do – … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, literature review, note-taking, reading
Tagged literature review, note-taking, Pat Thomson, reading
15 Comments
doing the literature review – thinking about patterns and groups
If you’ve ever watched small children playing then you’ll know that one of the things that they do is to sort things into groups. A bunch of coloured pens, pencils and markers can be sorted by type, colour, size, shape, … Continue reading →