blogging paper

This is a record of the writing of an academic paper by Thesis Whisperer, Inger Mewburn and me. This webpage archives a set of blogs written in November 2012 for #acwrimo. The paper has been published in a special issue of Studies in Higher Education.

The publisher kindly made the paper Open Access at one point but its now behind the paywall again. However, you can read about it here, here and here.

(1) Link to conference paper powerpoint on Slideshare

You will notice a difference in the argument between the powerpoint and the original abstract. This often happens when a prospective abstract is submitted for a conference.

(2) ORIGINAL ABSTRACT

Social media: an academic public good?

Current debates about the purposes of higher education often construct a binary between an older ideal of a Humboltian university dedicated to the greater public good and a modernised institution serving the needs of the knowledge economy. Within this binary, academics are generally portrayed as disillusioned and demoralised. While not wanting to deny the realities of today’s higher education (Holmwood, 2011), we have been exploring an arena where this picture does not ring true: academic blogging.

In this presentation we attempt a provisional taxonomy of academic blogging practices. Weblogs, or blogs they have come to be known, have been in existence for a little over a decade. It’s impossible to know how many blogs are run by academics; existing registries such as Technorati do not have an education section, let one which concentrates on academia. On the whole, Universities seem to pay little attention to the blogs run by their academics; it’s rare to find an institution that lists any blogs run by staff, let alone a comprehensive index. To further complicate the matter, the content on academic blogs can blur the boundaries between personal and professional.

Sourcing a large sample of blogs to analyse is the first stage of building a taxonomy. The use of ‘blogrolls’ – a list of suggested links to other blogs – enabled us to use a ‘snowball’ approach (Atkinson and Flint, 2011) to finding relevant blogs. To categorise the blogs we scanned the ‘about’ page, which generally states the purpose of the blog, and then a selection of the content to see if it matched the description. The analytical question we asked was: what academic work is being done in this blog?”

Broadly speaking academic blogs are either solo or collaboratively authored. Across this divide, some blogs are very focused on particular kinds of academic work, while others tended to slip between two or more of these types. Below is a list of the categories we have built, including descriptions.

Journey blogs
These blogs are usually authored by doctoral researchers about their PhD activities. These blogs tend to roam widely, covering research topics, experiences of research and the practices of everyday life. It is unclear who the PhD candidate imagines the audience is for their blog in many cases: is it the supervisor, the student themselves, other students, their broader research community or all of these at once? Along with pragmatic note keeping and idea generation (Ward and West, 2008), many candidates write candidly about problems they encounter and reflections on the process and are relatively candid about the gaps, mismatches and stumbles.

In many of these blogs the ‘messy reality’ of research is foregrounded; exactly the mess which is usually edited out or elided in more formal publication avenues such as journal papers and conferences. We could think of journey blogs as foregrounding a ‘confessional practice’, the primary difference which separates them from the other types.

Generally those blogs where the candidate is focussed on the journey of the self show little evidence of reader engagement (signalled by the number of comments and ‘pass alongs’ on social media). However some of these student blogs can slip into a ‘pedagogical mode’ where the candidate talks about techniques or processes they have adopted. There is a subgenre of the journey blog where this pedagogical intent has taken over. A small, but growing group of blogs run by doctoral candidates explicitly attempt to teach aspects of research or writing practice that they have found difficult.

It is interesting to see what happens to blogs where the PhD is finished. Occasionally the blog is abandoned, but sometimes the practice of blogging continues on, transformed into a professional and / private blog where the writer continues to have a dialogue with their imagined audience.

Self Help’ or ‘Survival’ Blogs
These are generally authored or edited by research support staff with the explicit purpose of helping researchers be more productive and effective. A subgenre of these blogs focus on writing or presenting research. Some attempt to assist researchers on the transition out of the PhD, or academia, into private practice or industry.

Academic Practice Blogs
In general these attempt to articulate academic practices for others. Blogs in this genre may be focussed on writing or on academic publishing ‘how tos’, tips for tertiary teachers, advice on using social media or they may range across a selection of scholarly questions and practices

Academic Blog Aggregators
There is an emerging trend for mainstream publishers to curate a site populated by blog and blog style content. Some universities are starting to host collaborative student blogs. There are tentative moves towards building ‘editorial opinion’ sites authored by academics for the general public, which seek to provide an alternative to mainstream newspapers.

Research Communication Blogs
These blogs focus on research findings of a general or specialist nature. The authors may be practising academics, doctoral candidates, early career researchers, adjuncts, retired academics or academics on extended leave. Some seek to engage and inform interested members of the public about areas of scholarly interest and / or facilitate dialogue within specific academic communities. Some of these blogs are more concerned with critique or commentary than others; these seems to be informed by disciplinary backgrounds of the bloggers.

With the possible exception of some blogs produced by academics in support services, the vast majority appear to be the result of individual or group initiative, are operated entirely on voluntary labour, bring little tangible reward to their writers and often bring together academics at various career stages.

We suggest that these blogs provide evidence of ongoing academic good will, intergenerational dialogues and the kinds of gift economies that are apparently in decline on other material locations. While there is evidence of some institutions wishing to regulate academic blogging, and increasing commercial activity, this still appears to be a space which is somewhat anarchic, open and fluid and where apparently endangered notions – such as sharing knowledge and expertise, taking time to engage in conversation, and offering assistance without expectations of reward – still operate.

References:
Atkinson, R and Flint, J (2011) Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Social Research Update 33. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.html. Accessed December, 4, 2011
Halavais, A. (2006) ‘Scholarly blogging: moving toward the visible college’, in Bruns, A. & Jacobs, J. (eds), Uses of Blogs, Peter Lang, New York, pp. 117-124.
Holmwood, J (2011), ed., A manifesto for the public university London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Ferguson, R., Clough, G. & Hosein, A. (2007) ‘Postgraduate blogs: Beyond the ordinary research journal’. Paper presented at ALT-C, Nottingham: Nottingham University. http://www.alt.ac.uk/altc2007/altc2007_documents/altc2007 _research_proceedings.pdf Accessed 22 April 2008.
Ward, M. H, West, S (2008) Blogging PhD candidature: revealing the pedagogy International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp: 60 – 71

16 Responses to blogging paper

  1. Pingback: #acwrimo work in progress: blogging a paper on blogging | patter

  2. cj13 says:

    A few thoughts. Blogging is also an academic academic good. I tend to think about it as a wonderfully unruly, unmeasurable (though folks try hard to apply metrics to it) space in which folk can write, share, critique etc. As we struggle to deal with this puny upstart that some see as a threat to “long form” writing, I think it offers a better insight into some of the way folk actually work than the finished products of papers, chapters and books. Steven Johnson is one of the few folk I know of who shares in some detail the various influences on his thinking and projects (He uses Kauffman’s the adjacent possible, exaptation and serendipity among a few others to paint an interesting picture of idea generation). We still tend to operate as if we were living in a paper-based world and for whatever reason don’t share the journey of our thinking and the often crazy influences that shape the final product. It’s nice to have good apple pie but so much more fun and instructive to watch a good pie maker actually do it. So maybe, given you are blogging your writing, you might blog a little about what you actually do. This is not unrelated to Latour’s notion of three notebooks.

    It is interesting that when folk write about writing, they are still a level or two above the actual doing of it. So advice is always some kind of abstraction: read more, write shorter sentences etc. But imagine writing a kind of commentary/log as you write, e.g. I really liked the notion of David Graeber’s about the paradox of the performative. Yes I am deliberately doing what I am arguing for :). And you do see some of that, in some academic blog writing but it is always a snippet here and there and often just a casual way of citing someone [David, G. (2012). THE SWORD, THE SPONGE, AND THE PARADOX OF PERFORMATIVITY: Some Observations on Fate, Luck, Financial Chicanery, and the Limits of Human Knowledge. Social Analysis, 56(1), 25-42. doi: 10.3167/sa.2012.560103]

    But back to ‘reading’ blogs. A kind of loopy metaphor may help. I’ve been reading too much in social neuroscience lately (It will be picked up in education sometime soon [groan] and add another layer of scientization to the caper). There are some amazing insights in the lit but that for another time. The point I am trying to make is that this field is in large part interested in the unconscious mind. One of my favourite quotes :
    If the conscious mind is like a Post-it note, then, by comparison, the unconscious mind is the Library of Congress. Haseltine, E. (2010). Long fuse, big bang : achieving long-term success through daily victories (1st ed.). New York: Hyperion, p. 152.

    So the blogosphere is a bit like the unconscious mind. The links that folk make are a little like synapses. If they get get used more than once they strengthen, a little like this project you are running. If they get used only once, they die eventually (all those bookmarks you have been meaning to follow up). Sheen writes about the strength of what he calls performative ties [http://frontpage.cbs.dk/insights/560004.shtml – the thesis is a good deal longer :)]. The point is that the conscious mind “thinks” it is in control, i.e. that new brilliant idea I just had when more often than not it is something dredged from our own unconscious and, sadly, our unconscious does not store book marks :).

    So, for me, this blog caper might be thought about less in terms of paper-based categories, i.e. another exercise in McLuhan rear-view mirrorism and chewed on a little more from some different angles. Hope this is useful to your mullings.

  3. Pingback: #acwrimo work in progress: how to research academic blogging? | patter

  4. Pingback: literature review step one, scoping. #acwrimo work in progress | patter

  5. Pingback: mapping the literatures – noting. #acwrimo work in progress | patter

  6. Pingback: stepping back to focus in – literature review stage three. #acwrimo work in progress | patter

  7. Pingback: stepping back to focus in – literature review stage three. #acwrimo work in progress | Top of Academia

  8. Pingback: mapping the literatures – noting. #acwrimo work in progress | Top of Academia

  9. Pingback: analysing blogs is messy, but that’s OK. #acwrimo work in progress | patter

  10. Pingback: focusing in on blogging literatures part two – #acwrimo work in progress | patter

  11. Pingback: our paper on academic blogging: using powerpoint as a planning tool | patter

  12. Pingback: blogging paper in progress | mothius1506's Blog

  13. Pingback: blogging paper | Digital English for International Students

  14. Hi there, just wanted to point out that the link provided leads to journal page where I have to subscribe to access the article. So no Open Access unless I am missing something.

  15. Pingback: Diary of a Research Fellow Part One: Starting out | Dr Anna Tarrant

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s