-
Recent Posts
Archives
Meta
- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic life academic writing argument authority in writing blogging books conclusion conference papers crafting writing discourse dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers epistemology Europe introduction journal knowledge production literature review mess methods chapter note-taking ontology peer review PhD PhD by publication powerpoint publication plan public engagement publishing readership reading refereeing reflection rejection research education research methods research plan research project scholarly identity signposts theory thesis time voice writing
Twitter Updates
- RT @tarabrabazon: New podcast.Tara's ten tips for a PhD oral examination: goo.gl/G3so5. Love to hear any feedback! #Phdchat 4 hours ago
- Did you know there are two major kinds of literature reviews, and several variants of each? patthomson.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/not… #phd #grad #ecr #acwri 4 hours ago
- Two headteachers I work with now have full drafts. Nothing but admiration for their determination. #Acwri 4 hours ago
Top Posts & Pages
- seven reasons why journals reject papers
- not all literature ‘reviews’ are the same
- writing the thesis
- the big book thesis has some advantages
- early onset satisfaction – a bad thing for writing and writers
- about me
- writing for journals
- this academic life
- what not to do in a thesis conclusion, part one: christmas present five
- a Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis
Category Archives: knowledge production
blank and blind spots in empirical research
It is important when writing about research to get clear about the difference between research that is inadequate and research that is partial. There are two concepts that are helpful in deciding which of these is the case. They are: … Continue reading
Posted in blank spot, blind spot, claims, Jon Wagner, knowledge production, last chapter, research project, thesis
Tagged blank and blind spots, claims, contribution, Jon Wagner, Pat Thomson, thesis
2 Comments
early career researchers and the high impact journal
I was recently on a shortlisting panel for the three year postdoctoral fellowships offered by my university. Each of the five faculties had produced their own priority list from which the panel was to choose a subset to be interviewed. … Continue reading
why doctoral researchers should go to the modern art museum
Really?? Why should early career researchers bother themselves with contemporary arts? Well, the answer could be to hold better conversations at dinner parties, or to help the team at the pub quiz. Or it could be to help the stroppy … Continue reading
Writing for publication – it’s just a matter of meeting the conventions of a journal, right?
Well, no. Not exactly. There is more involved in making choices about how to write for your target journal than simply deciding to adopt their usual writing style. I need to explain this assertion. Let’s take the example of what … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, data, epistemology, knowledge production
Tagged data, epistemology, Pat Thomson, scientific writing, writing choices
4 Comments