-
Recent Posts
Archives
Meta
- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic life academic writing argument authority in writing blogging books conclusion conference papers crafting writing discourse dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers epistemology Europe introduction journal knowledge production literature review mess methods chapter note-taking ontology peer review PhD PhD by publication powerpoint publication plan public engagement publishing readership reading refereeing reflection rejection research education research methods research plan research project scholarly identity signposts theory thesis time voice writing
Twitter Updates
- RT @HybridPed: It's time for journals to be author reviewed. chronicle.com/blogs/conversa… 58 minutes ago
- RT @John__Field: An unsolicited invitation from an open access journal wp.me/p1ZDGy-6R 1 hour ago
- RT @NSRiazat: Topic for #phdchat tonight (7.30pm - 8.30pm BST) is 'working on the literature review'. #phd #highered #doctorate 3 hours ago
Top Posts & Pages
- seven reasons why journals reject papers
- writing the thesis
- a Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis
- about me
- academic writing
- early onset satisfaction – a bad thing for writing and writers
- oh no, someone did the research before me...
- should you, could you, would you… co-write with your supervisor?
- writing for journals
- what not to do in a thesis conclusion, part one: christmas present five
Category Archives: research project
PhD by publication or PhD and publication – part two
After my first post about the changing nature of the PhD and the move to PhD by publication I was contacted by a number of people who were doing the by-publication doctorate. They were enthusiastic about it. One group were … Continue reading
thirteen reasons researchers get asked to write their methods chapter again
Dissertation examiners always check the methods chapter or methodological writings carefully. And the more the doctorate is seen as research training, the more important it will be for examiners to make sure that the relevant writings in the thesis really … Continue reading
blank and blind spots in empirical research
It is important when writing about research to get clear about the difference between research that is inadequate and research that is partial. There are two concepts that are helpful in deciding which of these is the case. They are: … Continue reading
Posted in blank spot, blind spot, claims, Jon Wagner, knowledge production, last chapter, research project, thesis
Tagged blank and blind spots, claims, contribution, Jon Wagner, Pat Thomson, thesis
2 Comments
doctoral training and the messiness of research
This post is written by Simon Bailey, a Research Fellow in the Business School at the University of Manchester. As a unique contribution to knowledge, doctorates are by definition very individual things. Though planning is very important, plans must be … Continue reading
why mess in a PhD can be a good thing
This guest post is by Dr Ben Kraal, who is a Research Fellow in the School of Design at Queensland University of Technology. At the moment he mostly works on the Human Systems part of the Airports of the Future … Continue reading
academic travel diary: coping with mess
So on this trip home to Australia my passport disappeared. I maintain it was stolen in Tullamarine somewhere in the jostle between Customs and the car park. This was almost a disaster because not only did it mean that I … Continue reading
Posted in mess, research methods, research project
Tagged mess in research, Pat Thomson, research methods, Simon Bailey, travel
15 Comments