-
Recent Posts
Archives
Meta
- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic life academic writing argument authority in writing blogging books conclusion conference papers crafting writing discourse dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers epistemology Europe introduction journal knowledge production literature review mess methods chapter note-taking ontology peer review PhD PhD by publication powerpoint publication plan public engagement publishing readership reading refereeing reflection rejection research education research methods research plan research project scholarly identity signposts theory thesis time voice writing
Twitter Updates
- not all literature ‘reviews’ are the same wp.me/p1GJk8-xO 4 hours ago
- RT @NHopUts: 10 easy ways to make sure you have no publications when you finish your phd & forever after wp.me/pLpEp-7i #phdchat #e… 16 hours ago
- Last plug for my post on why journals reject papers. ow.ly/lfR0o #acwri #phdchat #gradchat #ecrchat 18 hours ago
Top Posts & Pages
- seven reasons why journals reject papers
- not all literature ‘reviews’ are the same
- writing the thesis
- writing for journals
- oh no, someone did the research before me...
- early onset satisfaction – a bad thing for writing and writers
- about me
- a Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis
- what not to do in a thesis conclusion, part one: christmas present five
- academic writing
Tag Archives: academic publishing
when senior academics are interested in your work …
I was recently told a very disconcerting story by a supervisor about something that had just happened to one of the doctoral researchers she was working with. I’m repeating it here because it’s a cautionary tale. The moral of the … Continue reading
early career researchers and the high impact journal
I was recently on a shortlisting panel for the three year postdoctoral fellowships offered by my university. Each of the five faculties had produced their own priority list from which the panel was to choose a subset to be interviewed. … Continue reading
refereeing a journal article. part 3. writing the feedback
Having read the article carefully, and decided whether it’s accept without change, revise and resubmit or reject, there is now the task of writing the feedback to the author/s. There are four things to keep in mind when writing feedback: … Continue reading
Posted in feedback, journal, peer review, refereeing
Tagged academic publishing, feedback, Pat Thomson, peer review, refereeing
12 Comments
never write a book without a publishing contract
A colleague of mine told me recently that he was writing a book. Just on spec, he said. And did I have any advice about what publishers might be interested. What could I say? I wanted to say give up … Continue reading
can I get a book from my PhD?
Well maybe is the answer. Maybe. First of all, all PhDs can generate some refereed journal articles. But not all PhDs have enough in them to become a book. This is because the PhD and a book have to do … Continue reading