-
Recent Posts
Archives
Meta
- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic life academic writing argument authority in writing blogging books conclusion conference papers crafting writing discourse dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers epistemology Europe introduction journal knowledge production literature review mess methods chapter note-taking ontology peer review PhD PhD by publication powerpoint publication plan public engagement publishing readership reading refereeing reflection rejection research education research methods research plan research project scholarly identity signposts theory thesis time voice writing
Twitter Updates
- not all literature ‘reviews’ are the same wp.me/p1GJk8-xO 6 hours ago
- RT @NHopUts: 10 easy ways to make sure you have no publications when you finish your phd & forever after wp.me/pLpEp-7i #phdchat #e… 18 hours ago
- Last plug for my post on why journals reject papers. ow.ly/lfR0o #acwri #phdchat #gradchat #ecrchat 21 hours ago
Top Posts & Pages
- seven reasons why journals reject papers
- not all literature ‘reviews’ are the same
- writing the thesis
- writing for journals
- oh no, someone did the research before me...
- about me
- early onset satisfaction – a bad thing for writing and writers
- a Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis
- what not to do in a thesis conclusion, part one: christmas present five
- academic writing
Tag Archives: reflection
mulling it over – a thinking tool for reflecting on a research experience
Reflection is one of those weasel-ly words that can mean anything and nothing. Most of us acknowledge that we need to do it, but what does it actually mean as a practice? You are probably familiar with Donald Schön’s (a) … Continue reading
Posted in conceptual, experience, introspection, recollection, reflection, reflexivity, theory
Tagged Donald Schon, experience, Maria Piantanida, Noreen Garman, Pat Thomson, reflection, reflexivity
1 Comment
can you write about mess in your thesis and if so how? part two
Peter Matthews continues his post about writing about the messy bits of his research. In my previous post I reported the “positive story” of my fieldwork – reflecting on that feeling of “connection” with my research participants in the narrative … Continue reading
can you write about mess in your thesis, and if so, how? part one
This post is written by Dr Peter Matthews who works in the School of the Built Environment at Herriott Watt. Peter’s blog is Urbanity…History and he tweets as @urbaneprofessor. I asked him to show and tell how he talked about … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, interview, mess, PhD, reflection, research methods, thesis
Tagged interview, mess, Peter Matthews, reflection, thesis
3 Comments